MDL-3026 Abbott & Mead Johnson, N.D. Ill.

NEC Formula Verdicts & Appeals Tracker

Updated August 3, 2026. The NEC litigation has produced large state-court verdicts and a run of federal defense wins, and the appellate picture is genuinely complicated. Gross plaintiff verdicts total about $625 million; the amount still standing after appeals is about $565 million. None is final, and there is no settlement. This page is updated on every appellate move.

Last Updated: August 3, 2026
6 min read
JPML Data Verified
5 sources cited

Key Takeaways

  • Gross plaintiff verdicts total about $625 million; about $565 million still stands after appeals, and none is final
  • The $495M Gill verdict was affirmed but unpublished; Abbott is applying to the Missouri Supreme Court
  • The $60M Watson verdict was reversed June 12, 2026 on learned intermediary grounds
  • Federally, the first three bellwethers were dismissed on causation, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed one on July 24, 2026
  • There is no settlement; verdicts are not a guide to individual case value

The full record

Case Venue Verdict Status
Gill v. Abbott St. Louis, MO (state) $495M plaintiff ($95M compensatory + $400M punitive) Affirmed May 5, 2026 (unpublished); transfer denied June 22, 2026; Abbott applying to the Missouri Supreme Court. Not final.
Cook County consolidated (4 plaintiffs) Cook County, IL (state) $70M plaintiff ($53M compensatory + $17M punitive) April 9-10, 2026. Post-trial status not verified.
Watson v. Mead Johnson St. Clair County, IL (state) $60M plaintiff Reversed June 12, 2026 in a published opinion applying the learned intermediary doctrine; new trial.
Whitfield St. Louis, MO (state) Defense Vacated March 13, 2025; new trial ordered; on appeal.
K.H. St. Louis, MO (state) Defense July 2, 2026; stands. Jury found against the plaintiff on specific causation.
Mar v. Abbott MDL-3026 (federal) Defense summary judgment Affirmed by the Seventh Circuit July 24, 2026 on warning causation.
Diggs v. Abbott MDL-3026 (federal) Defense summary judgment July 2025.
Third federal bellwether MDL-3026 (federal) Defense summary judgment October 2025.
Inman v. Mead Johnson MDL-3026 (federal) Survived summary judgment May 8, 2026 First federal NEC case where a plaintiff causation expert cleared a pretrial challenge. Trial date not publicly verified.

These are jury verdicts and court rulings. The underlying claim, that cow's-milk-based preterm formula increases the alleged risk of NEC, remains contested. Dollar figures are jury verdicts, not settlement values or projections. There is no settlement in this litigation.

Federal and state courts are diverging

The single most important thing to understand is that federal and state courts have gone different ways. In the MDL, the early bellwethers were dismissed on summary judgment for the defense, with the court applying the Daubert reliability standard strictly to the fit between plaintiffs' general-causation experts and each infant's gestational age and weight. No federal NEC bellwether has reached a jury, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed one of those dismissals in Mar v. Abbott on July 24, 2026. The lone federal bright spot for plaintiffs is Inman v. Mead Johnson, which survived summary judgment in May 2026; its trial date is not publicly verified.

State juries have been more receptive, producing the $495 million Gill, $70 million Cook County, and $60 million Watson verdicts. But state appellate courts have started to pull those back. The Watson verdict was reversed on learned intermediary grounds, the Gill affirmance was unpublished and is now before the Missouri Supreme Court on Abbott's application, and a St. Louis defense verdict in the K.H. case stands, with the jury finding against the plaintiff on specific causation.

The honest read is that the verdict totals look large, but the trend line is running against plaintiffs on causation, and nothing is final. That is exactly why a running, sourced tracker is more useful here than a headline number.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much have NEC juries awarded?
Gross plaintiff verdicts total about $625 million: a $495 million Missouri verdict in Gill v. Abbott, a $70 million Cook County verdict for four families, and a $60 million verdict in Watson v. Mead Johnson. After appeals, the amount still standing is about $565 million, because the Watson verdict was reversed. None of the standing verdicts is final. These are jury verdicts, not settlement values, and there is no settlement in this litigation.
Is the $495 million Gill verdict final?
No. The $495 million Gill v. Abbott verdict ($95 million compensatory plus $400 million punitive) was affirmed on May 5, 2026, but in an unpublished opinion, and transfer was denied on June 22, 2026. Abbott is applying to the Missouri Supreme Court, so the verdict is not final and could still be reduced or overturned.
What did the Seventh Circuit decide?
On July 24, 2026 the Seventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Abbott in Mar v. Abbott, holding the plaintiff had not shown that a different warning would have changed the outcome. Abbott has now won the first three federal bellwethers on warning causation, and no federal NEC bellwether has reached a jury.
Is there a NEC settlement?
No. There is no settlement and no settlement program, and no settlement amounts have been disclosed. Because verdicts have been reversed, vacated, or remain on appeal, they are not a reliable guide to individual case value, and we do not publish projected or average per-case figures.

Sources & References

5 sources cited

• Seventh Circuit opinion in Mar v. Abbott (July 24, 2026)

• Missouri appellate affirmance of Gill v. Abbott (May 5, 2026, unpublished); transfer denied June 22, 2026

• Illinois Fifth District reversal of Watson v. Mead Johnson (June 12, 2026, published)

• State-court verdict reporting for the Cook County consolidated trial, Whitfield, and K.H.

• U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois: MDL-3026 bellwether rulings

Attorney Advertising. The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this content.

Every case is unique, and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Past settlement amounts and case outcomes do not guarantee similar results in your case. If you believe you have a legal claim, you should consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who can evaluate your specific situation.

Read our full disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use