Consumer Product MDL-3060 Actively Recruiting • Northern District of Illinois

Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (Chemical Hair Straighteners)

Federal litigation alleging chemical hair relaxers and straighteners caused uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, and other serious health conditions. An NIH study found frequent users face more than twice the risk of uterine cancer.

Last Updated: October 1, 2026
20 min read
JPML Data Verified
12 sources cited

Key Takeaways

  • Over 12,300 cases pending as of October 2026 with 26% growth
  • NIH study found 2.55x higher uterine cancer risk in frequent users
  • Formaldehyde classified as carcinogenic (Group 1) by IARC
  • Major defendants include L'Oreal, Revlon, and Softsheen-Carson
  • First bellwether trial set for September 7, 2027

October 2026 Updates Latest

10 → 5
Bellwether pool
Jan 11, 2027
SJ & Rule 702 motions due
Sep 7, 2027
First bellwether trial
None yet
Global settlement status
Where it stands

12,381 cases pending (16,828 total). The court has set the first bellwether trial for September 7, 2027. Fact discovery on the 32-case bellwether pool closed March 18, 2026, and the parties' joint proposed order cutting the current ten-case pool to five is due October 21, 2026. Expert discovery for those five cases closes December 21, 2026. Summary judgment and case-specific expert (Rule 702) motions are due January 11, 2027. Defendants' general-causation expert motion, fully briefed in June 2026, was still awaiting a ruling as of September 30.

Second Wave stay lifted; first bellwether trial set for Sept. 7, 2027

On July 24, 2026, the court lifted the stay for the Second Wave defendants, writing, "It is time to litigate." Case Management Order 24, entered August 27, sets Second Wave discovery deadlines, including third-party document subpoenas by April 1, 2027 and deposition subpoenas by June 1, 2027. A separate August 20 order, also entered August 27, set the bellwether expert schedule: defense case-specific expert reports were due September 25, and plaintiffs' rebuttals are due October 13. On September 24, 2026, the court set the first bellwether trial for September 7, 2027, with monthly status conferences in 2027.

Settlement discussions, deposition disputes & Revlon's reserve

Special Master Ellen K. Reisman continues overseeing settlement discussions, with Judge Rowland encouraging the parties to reach agreement on threshold issues like warnings, product instructions, and marketing in order to streamline 11,000+ cases. Disputes persist over corporate witness depositions, with defendants still offering written stipulations in lieu of live testimony. Revlon's bankruptcy reserve of $44 million remains the only allocated claim fund. No global settlement has been announced, and no per-case values have been established.

12,381
Pending Actions
2.55x
Higher Cancer Risk
Group 1
IARC Carcinogen
Sep 2027
First Bellwether Trial

Key Facts (October 2026)

Pending Actions 12,381+ cases in federal MDL
Total Actions Filed 16,828+ cases
Key Defendants L'Oreal, Revlon, Softsheen-Carson, Strength of Nature, Dabur, Namaste Labs
Presiding Judge Hon. Mary M. Rowland (N.D. Illinois)
MDL Created February 6, 2023
NIH Sister Study (Oct 2022) Frequent users 2.55x more likely to develop uterine cancer
Formaldehyde Classification IARC Group 1 carcinogen (known to cause cancer in humans)
FDA Ban Status Proposed October 2023, deadline missed April 2024
Can You Still File? Yes, lawsuits are actively being filed

Continued Case Growth

Cases continue to be filed as more women come forward following the NIH study linking hair relaxers to uterine cancer. Case count has grown 26% since January 2025.

Jan 25
9,819
Feb 25
9,958
Mar 25
9,974
Apr 25
10,095
May 25
10,172
Jun 25
10,314
Jul 25
10,487
Aug 25
10,645
Sep 25
10,720
Oct 25
10,807
Nov 25
10,846
Dec 25
10,844
Jan 26
10,948
Feb 26
11,195
Mar 26
11,440
Apr 26
11,371
May 26
11,526
Jun 26
11,723
Jul 26
11,877
Aug 26
11,779
Sep 26
12,129
Oct 26
12,381

Source: JPML MDL Statistics Reports, January 2025-October 2026

NIH Sister Study Finding (October 2022)

A landmark study by the National Institutes of Health found that women who used chemical hair straightening products more than four times per year were more than twice as likely (2.55x) to develop uterine cancer compared to those who did not use these products.

"We estimated that 1.64% of women who never used hair straighteners would go on to develop uterine cancer by the age of 70; but for frequent users, that risk goes up to 4.05%." — Dr. Alexandra White, NIEHS

1 What Is This Lawsuit About?

Thousands of women have filed lawsuits alleging that chemical hair relaxers and straighteners caused them to develop uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, uterine fibroids, and other serious health conditions. The products, which have been primarily marketed to Black women for decades, contain potentially harmful chemicals including formaldehyde, phthalates, and parabens.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers knew or should have known about the cancer risks associated with their products but failed to adequately warn consumers. The chemicals in these products can be absorbed through the scalp and may act as endocrine disruptors—interfering with the body's hormonal system and potentially leading to hormone-sensitive cancers.

Disproportionate Impact: Approximately 60% of participants who reported using hair straighteners in the NIH study were Black women. Because Black women use these products more frequently and tend to start using them at earlier ages, these findings may be especially relevant to them.

2 Harmful Chemicals in Hair Relaxers

Chemical hair relaxers contain multiple compounds that have been linked to serious health problems. Many of these are classified as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that can interfere with the body's hormonal system.

2024 Biomarker Study (PMID: 38810806): A CDC-supported study found that Black women who used hair products in the previous 24 hours had 16.2% higher phthalate levels, 35.0% higher methyl paraben, and 32.3% higher ethyl paraben concentrations in their urine.

Known Carcinogens

  • Formaldehyde — IARC Group 1 carcinogen (2004); releases when products are heated
  • Methylene glycol — Formaldehyde-releasing chemical often disguised on labels

Endocrine Disruptors

  • Phthalates (DEHP) — Hormone disruptors used for fragrance
  • Parabens — Preservatives that mimic estrogen
  • Bisphenol A (BPA) — Known endocrine disruptor

Active Straightening Agents

  • Sodium hydroxide (lye) — Causes skin/scalp burns, lung irritation
  • Guanidine carbonate — "No-lye" alternative, still caustic

Other Chemicals of Concern

  • Cyclosiloxanes — Endocrine and reproductive effects
  • Benzophenone-3 — UV filter, potential hormone disruptor
  • Diethanolamine (DEA) — Can form carcinogenic compounds

3 Health Conditions Linked to Hair Relaxers

Multiple peer-reviewed studies have found associations between chemical hair relaxer use and serious health conditions. The scientific evidence continues to grow.

Uterine Cancer

NIH Sister Study (2022): Women who used hair straighteners 4+ times/year were 2.55x more likely to develop uterine cancer. Risk increased from 1.64% to 4.05% by age 70.

Black Women's Health Study (2023): Postmenopausal Black women who used relaxers more than 2x/year or for more than 5 years had >50% increased risk.

Ovarian Cancer

NIH Sister Study (2021): Frequent use (4+ times/year) of hair straighteners was associated with a 2.19x higher risk of ovarian cancer (HR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.12-4.27).

Breast Cancer

Black Women's Health Study (2021): Black women who used lye-based hair relaxers 7+ times/year for more than 15 years had a 30% increased risk of breast cancer.

Uterine Fibroids

Black Women's Health Study (2012): Women with 10+ years of frequent relaxer use had elevated fibroid occurrence. Other studies found 2-3x higher risk for routine users.

Early Puberty & Hormonal Disruption

Hair relaxer use by children has been linked to early onset of puberty. The endocrine-disrupting chemicals can cause hormonal imbalances, which may increase later risk for metabolic syndromes, Type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

4 Regulatory & Scientific Timeline

2004
IARC Classifies Formaldehyde as Group 1 Carcinogen

International Agency for Research on Cancer determines "sufficient evidence" that formaldehyde causes cancer in humans.

2010
NIOSH Finds Hidden Formaldehyde

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health discovers Brazilian Blowout contains 100x the formaldehyde allowed by OSHA despite "formaldehyde free" labeling.

2012
BWHS Links Relaxers to Uterine Fibroids

Black Women's Health Study publishes findings connecting long-term hair relaxer use to increased uterine fibroid risk.

2016
FDA Scientists Deem Products Unsafe

Internal FDA emails (obtained via FOIA) reveal scientists deemed hair straighteners with formaldehyde unsafe. FDA labels formaldehyde as human carcinogen.

Oct 2022
NIH Sister Study Published (PMID: 36245087)

Landmark study in Journal of the National Cancer Institute finds 2.55x higher uterine cancer risk for frequent users. Triggers wave of litigation.

Dec 2022
MoCRA Becomes Law

Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 passes, giving FDA its first major cosmetics authority since 1938. Requires adverse event reporting, facility registration, and grants mandatory recall powers.

Feb 2023
MDL-3060 Created

JPML consolidates 50+ lawsuits into MDL-3060 in Northern District of Illinois before Judge Mary M. Rowland.

Oct 2023
FDA Proposes Formaldehyde Ban

FDA proposes banning formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing chemicals in hair straighteners, with April 2024 implementation target.

Apr 2024
FDA Misses Ban Deadline

FDA fails to finalize formaldehyde ban by self-imposed deadline. Agency states rule remains "high priority."

Jan 2025
California Bans Formaldehyde in Cosmetics

California's Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act takes effect, banning formaldehyde in personal care products.

Nov 2025
First Bellwether Trials Scheduled

Initial bellwether trial milestones; trial dates have since shifted to 2027. Special Master appointed for settlement negotiations.

Sep 2026
First Bellwether Trial Set

Court sets the first bellwether trial for September 7, 2027, in a September 24, 2026 order that also schedules monthly status conferences in 2027.

5 Do You Qualify for Compensation?

You may be eligible to file a claim if you meet these criteria:

Eligibility Requirements

  • Regular use of chemical hair relaxers or straighteners — Used products 4 or more times per year for an extended period (multiple years)
  • Diagnosed with a qualifying condition — Uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, or uterine fibroids
  • Diagnosis occurred after product use — The health condition was diagnosed after a period of using hair relaxer products
  • Within statute of limitations — Generally 2-3 years from diagnosis, but varies by state
New Cases Still Being Filed: Cases are actively being added to MDL-3060. With the first bellwether trial set for September 7, 2027, this litigation is still in relatively early stages. A free consultation can help determine if you have a viable claim.

6 Frequently Asked Questions

What did the NIH Sister Study find?
The October 2022 NIH Sister Study followed nearly 34,000 women for about 11 years. Researchers found that women who used hair straightening products more than 4 times per year were 2.55 times more likely to develop uterine cancer. For frequent users, the lifetime risk increased from 1.64% to 4.05% by age 70. Approximately 60% of participants who used straighteners were Black women.
Why are Black women disproportionately affected?
Chemical hair relaxers have been predominantly marketed to Black women for decades. Studies show 84-95% of Black women in the U.S. have used relaxers, often starting at young ages. Higher frequency of use and earlier initiation means greater cumulative exposure to the harmful chemicals. This may help explain why hormone-related cancers disproportionately affect Black women.
Are keratin treatments and Brazilian Blowouts included?
Yes, keratin treatments and Brazilian Blowouts often contain formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing chemicals, even when labeled "formaldehyde-free." In 2010, NIOSH found Brazilian Blowout contained 100 times the formaldehyde allowed by OSHA. These products release formaldehyde gas when heated during application, posing risks to both clients and salon workers.
What products are named in the lawsuits?
Products named include Dark & Lovely, Optimum, Mizani (L'Oreal), Creme of Nature (Revlon), Just for Me, Motions, African Pride, TCB, Dr. Miracle's (Strength of Nature), ORS Olive Oil (Dabur/Namaste), Cantu (PDC Brands), Design Essentials (McBride), and Affirm (Avlon), among others.
What compensation is available?
No global settlements have been reached yet. The MDL is still in the bellwether selection phase, with the first bellwether trial set for September 7, 2027. Potential compensation may cover medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and other damages. Settlement amounts will depend on bellwether trial outcomes.
Has the FDA banned these products?
Not yet at the federal level. The FDA proposed a ban on formaldehyde in hair relaxers in October 2023, but missed its April 2024 deadline. California has banned formaldehyde in cosmetics as of January 2025 under its Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act. The European Union has long restricted formaldehyde in cosmetics.
When will bellwether trials begin?
The first bellwether trial is set for September 7, 2027, under a September 24, 2026 order that also schedules monthly status conferences in 2027. The parties' joint proposed order cutting the bellwether pool from ten cases to five is due October 21, 2026. Expert discovery for those five cases closes December 21, 2026. Summary judgment and case-specific expert (Rule 702) motions are due January 11, 2027, with oppositions due February 10 and replies due February 24, 2027. The Special Master continues to facilitate settlement discussions in parallel.

Sources & References

12 official sources cited

• Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) — Official MDL statistics and transfer orders

• Chang C, et al. "Use of Straighteners and Other Hair Products and Incident Uterine Cancer." J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(12):1636-1645 (PMID: 36245087)

• Schildroth S, et al. "Hair product use and urinary biomarker concentrations..." Chemosphere. 2024;361:142442 (PMID: 38810806)

• Bertrand KA, et al. "Hair relaxer use and risk of uterine cancer in the Black Women's Health Study." Environ Res. 2023;239(Pt 1):117228 (PMID: 37821068)

• Wise LA, et al. "Hair relaxer use and risk of uterine leiomyomata in African-American women." Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(5):432-40 (PMID: 22234483)

• National Institutes of Health (NIH) — News release: "Hair straightening chemicals associated with higher uterine cancer risk" (October 2022)

• National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) — Sister Study and Environmental Factor Newsletter

• International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) — Formaldehyde classification (Group 1 carcinogen, 2004)

• U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (MoCRA) 2022; Formaldehyde in Hair Smoothing Products

• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) — Brazilian Blowout formaldehyde findings (2010)

• California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) — Chemicals in Hair Straightening Products report

• U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — MDL No. 3060 docket, No. 1:23-cv-00818 (orders of July 24, August 27 and September 24, 2026, via CourtListener)

Attorney Advertising. The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this content.

Every case is unique, and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Past settlement amounts and case outcomes do not guarantee similar results in your case. If you believe you have a legal claim, you should consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who can evaluate your specific situation.

Read our full disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use