Norada Capital Investor Fraud Lawsuit
(Norada Entities Securities Litigation)
An MDL, created August 7, 2026, consolidating investor lawsuits over an alleged investment-fraud scheme run through Norada Capital Management and affiliated funds. Investors say they bought high-yield promissory notes marketed as safe, while the SEC alleges the money funded a Ponzi-like operation. The MDL runs alongside parallel SEC and criminal cases in the same court.
Key Takeaways
- MDL-3189 was centralized on August 7, 2026 in the Central District of California before Judge Michelle Williams Court
- Investors allege they bought high-yield promissory notes marketed as safe, run through Norada Capital Management and affiliated funds controlled by Marco G. Santarelli
- The SEC alleges a Ponzi-like operation; the DOJ alleges roughly $62.5 million in losses affecting more than 500 investors
- Santarelli consented to an SEC judgment on liability and, per the SEC, pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal case
- 46 actions pending as of October 2026; an initial scheduling conference is set for October 9, 2026
October 2026 Status Latest
MDL-3189 was created August 7, 2026. The JPML centralized the cases after oral argument at its July 30, 2026 hearing session and assigned the MDL to Judge Michelle Williams Court in the Central District of California. The moving party had asked for the District of Wyoming; the Panel chose the Central District of California because the SEC civil action and the criminal case against Santarelli were already pending there. As of the October 2026 JPML report, 46 actions were pending (45 at centralization).
First conference set for October 9. A September 9, 2026 order set an initial scheduling conference for October 9, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. (Courtroom 6A, Los Angeles). A joint report and applications for lead and liaison counsel were due September 25. The agenda includes appointing lead counsel and the pending motions to dismiss. Discovery is stayed.
The government cases are further along. Santarelli has consented to an SEC judgment on liability, with monetary amounts to be set later, and, according to the SEC, has pleaded guilty in the parallel criminal case.
Key Facts (October 2026)
| Pending Actions | 46 actions in federal MDL |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Central District of California |
| Presiding Judge | Hon. Michelle Williams Court, U.S. District Judge |
| Date Centralized | August 7, 2026 (JPML transfer order) |
| Claim Type | Securities fraud — investor losses |
| Central Individual | Marco G. Santarelli |
| Parallel SEC Case | SEC v. Santarelli, No. 8:25-cv-02375 (C.D. Cal.) |
| Alleged Scheme Period | June 2020 to June 2024 |
A note on the "Norada" name
There is a separate, long-established turnkey real-estate company that also uses the "Norada" name. This litigation and the related government cases concern Norada Capital Management and its investment funds. Readers should not assume a connection between the two unless it is confirmed by a primary source.
1 What the Norada Entities Are
The "Norada Entities" refers to Norada Capital Management and a group of affiliated investment funds that operated under the Norada Capital name. Based on the JPML transfer order, these include funds named for the areas Santarelli said he invested in — such as a crypto fund, a real estate fund, an e-commerce fund, and a theatrical (Broadway) productions fund — along with related management and funding entities. All were founded or controlled by Marco G. Santarelli, of Laguna Niguel, California.
2 What Investors Say Happened
According to the SEC, from about June 2020 through June 2024, Santarelli raised tens of millions of dollars by selling promissory notes through Norada Capital Management. The SEC says the notes were falsely described as having strong capital-preservation potential, when the investments were in fact volatile and speculative, with higher rates offered for larger investments.
The SEC states that by August 2023 the company could no longer pay the returns it had promised, and that Santarelli then ran a Ponzi-like operation, using money from new investors to pay earlier investors. He suspended distributions in June 2024, and operations ceased by early 2025.
The Department of Justice, in announcing its criminal charge, alleged that the scheme caused roughly $62.5 million in investor losses and affected more than 500 investors, and that law enforcement had seized more than $5 million in proceeds. These figures are government allegations tied to the enforcement actions.
3 The Government Cases: SEC and DOJ
SEC civil action. The SEC filed SEC v. Marco G. Santarelli, No. 8:25-cv-02375, in the Central District of California on October 20, 2025. The complaint alleged violations of the antifraud and securities-registration provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Santarelli consented to a permanent injunction against future violations and agreed that the court would order a civil penalty, disgorgement, and prejudgment interest in amounts to be determined later on the SEC's motion. The SEC announced the settlement in Litigation Release No. 26420 on November 19, 2025.
Criminal action. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California charged Santarelli with wire fraud, announced on September 9, 2025. According to the SEC's November 2025 litigation release, Santarelli pleaded guilty to the criminal charges brought in that parallel action.
These government cases matter to investors because SEC disgorgement and criminal restitution can become avenues for recovering some losses, separate from the private MDL.
4 The Litigation: MDL-3189
The MDL brings together private lawsuits filed by investors across multiple districts, including cases originally filed in the Central District of California, the Middle District of Florida, and the District of Wyoming. The lead defendant is Santarelli, along with the Norada Capital entities. The transfer order also names additional defendants beyond Santarelli; the specific role of each is best confirmed from the individual complaints.
Initial scheduling order. On September 9, 2026 (Dkt. 4), the court issued an Order Setting Initial Scheduling Conference for October 9, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6A in Los Angeles. A joint report and applications for lead and liaison counsel were due September 25. The order named Robert V. Cornish Jr. (for plaintiffs) and Thomas Andrew Szott (for defendants) to convene counsel, and it stayed discovery. The conference agenda includes appointing lead counsel and the pending motions to dismiss.
Timeline
- June 2020 – June 2024 — the alleged scheme period, according to the SEC.
- September 9, 2025 — DOJ announces a criminal wire-fraud charge against Santarelli.
- October 20, 2025 — SEC files its civil complaint in the Central District of California.
- November 19, 2025 — SEC announces Santarelli consented to a judgment on liability and, in the criminal case, pleaded guilty.
- August 7, 2026 — JPML centralizes the private investor cases as MDL-3189.
- September 1, 2026 — 46 actions pending.
- September 9, 2026 — Court sets an initial scheduling conference for October 9, 2026; lead and liaison counsel applications due September 25.
- October 1, 2026 — 46 actions pending.
5 Who May Be Affected
This litigation concerns investors who put money into Norada Capital. People who may be affected generally include:
- Investors who bought Norada Capital promissory notes during the alleged scheme period (about June 2020 through June 2024).
- Investors who were told the notes offered safety or capital preservation and later were unable to get their money back.
- Investors whose distributions were suspended in or after June 2024.
Investors in this situation may have more than one path to try to recover losses — including the private MDL, the SEC action (which contemplates disgorgement), and criminal restitution in the DOJ case. Because deadlines and requirements differ across these paths, affected investors should evaluate their situation and preserve their records, including note agreements, account statements, and communications.
? Frequently Asked Questions
What is this case about?
It is about an alleged investment-fraud scheme run through Norada Capital Management and affiliated funds. Investors say they bought promissory notes marketed as safe, and the SEC alleges the money was used in a Ponzi-like operation.
Who is Marco Santarelli in this case?
He is the individual who founded and controlled the Norada Capital entities. The SEC sued him and he consented to a judgment on liability. According to the SEC, he also pleaded guilty in a parallel criminal case brought by federal prosecutors.
Is this connected to the Norada real-estate company of a similar name?
This litigation concerns Norada Capital and its investment funds. A separate company uses a similar name. Readers should not assume the two are connected without confirmation from a primary source.
How many cases are in the MDL?
The Panel centralized 45 actions on August 7, 2026, and 46 were pending as of the October 2026 JPML report.
How could an investor recover money?
There are potentially several routes, including the private MDL, SEC disgorgement, and criminal restitution. Each has its own process and deadlines, so affected investors should evaluate them and keep their investment records.
Sources & References
7 official sources cited• JPML, Transfer Order, MDL-3189 (Aug. 7, 2026)
• JPML, Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending (Oct. 1, 2026)
• U.S. District Court (C.D. Cal.), Order Setting Initial Scheduling Conference, MDL-3189, Dkt. 4 (Sept. 9, 2026)
• SEC, Litigation Release No. 26420, SEC v. Marco G. Santarelli (Nov. 19, 2025)
• SEC, Complaint, SEC v. Santarelli, No. 8:25-cv-02375 (C.D. Cal.)
• U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office (C.D. Cal.), press release on wire-fraud charge (Sept. 9, 2025)
• Federal Judicial Center, biography of Judge Michelle Williams Court
Attorney Advertising. The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this content.
Every case is unique, and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Past settlement amounts and case outcomes do not guarantee similar results in your case. If you believe you have a legal claim, you should consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who can evaluate your specific situation.