Florida Walks Away From Meta's $17 Billion Deal and Says It Will Go to Trial

What Florida said

Uthmeier's announcement came on X the day the deal was filed. "Florida didn't join the Meta settlement," he wrote. "The payouts are peanuts compared to the profound harms Meta's profit-driven addictive features inflicted on kids, and a slap on the wrist for a trillion-dollar corp." In a statement to Orlando's News 6 he added that "corporations like Meta will never learn a lesson if they don't incur real costs for breaking the law," and repeated the line that has since defined Florida's position: "We'll see them at trial."

To Bloomberg Law the next day he was blunter about the arithmetic. Against Meta's valuation of more than a trillion dollars, he said, the settlement is "a rounding error, weeks of revenue. This is peanuts." He pointed to the tobacco industry's $206 billion master settlement of 1998 as the benchmark a case about harm to children should be measured against. By August 29, WPTV was describing Florida as the only state in the nation to reject its share.

Where Florida's case actually stands

Florida sued Meta in 2023 in the Middle District of Florida rather than joining the multistate complaint, and its case was coordinated into MDL-3047 for pretrial proceedings before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. In November 2024 she ruled on Meta's motion to dismiss Florida's claims. The state's core claim, that Meta's design of Instagram and Facebook to maximize compulsive use by minors violates the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, survived: because Meta purposefully directed its activities at Florida and the claim arises from those contacts, a Florida federal court can exercise jurisdiction. Florida's claim under the federal children's privacy law, COPPA, was dismissed without prejudice for improper venue, and a claim about Meta Pay was dismissed for insufficient factual allegations.

That leaves Florida's federal case with a single live consumer-protection claim, the same species of claim the 29-state coalition took to trial in August before settling. The record from that trial, two weeks of testimony from a Meta whistleblower, outside experts, a former Instagram well-being researcher, and Instagram head Adam Mosseri, is public and available to Florida's lawyers. What Florida does not have is a trial date. As of September 15, 2026, the official MDL-3047 calendar listed a case management conference on September 21, a September 29 hearing on X Corp's motion to strike, and school-district pretrial conferences in November and December; it listed nothing for Florida. Whether the FDUTPA claim is tried in Oakland or sent back to Florida for trial has not been reported.

Update, October 7: Florida asks a state judge for immediate changes

Florida has a second case. In December 2024, then-Attorney General Ashley Moody sued Meta and Instagram in Florida state court in Pasco County (No. 24-CA-3193), seeking an injunction and civil penalties under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as reported by the News Service of Florida. That is where Florida made its next move. On October 7, 2026, Attorney General James Uthmeier filed an 85-page motion asking the Pasco County court for a temporary injunction: changes ordered now and kept in place while the lawsuit continues.

The motion asks the court to order Meta to verify users' ages and remove users under 14 from Instagram and Facebook, to change the platforms to reduce addictive use by teens, and to stop making deceptive statements and correct past ones. Reuters reported that the requested changes include limiting teens to two hours a day across Meta's apps, turning off features like autoplay and infinite scroll for them, cutting off their access to messaging once their time limits are hit, and barring Meta from showing them advertisements, which goes further than the teen defaults Meta agreed to in its settlement with the states. Florida argues that the changes Meta agreed to elsewhere show these are possible. The motion relies on the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and section 501.1736 of the Florida Statutes, the state's 2024 law on social media accounts for minors.

Meta called it "a meritless preliminary injunction years into the litigation" and said the attorney general "should be using taxpayer resources to get YouTube and TikTok to empower parents and protect teens in Florida," according to Reuters. No hearing date on the motion has been reported. A temporary injunction is not a verdict: if granted, it would require changes in Florida while the case is litigated, and it would not pay anything to families.

Three states, three different exits

Florida is not the only state outside the multistate deal, but it is the only one that refused it. New Mexico never needed it: its separate child-safety case, focused on child exploitation rather than addictive design, produced a $942 million order against Meta on August 7, made up of $375 million in penalties and a $567 million abatement fund, and Meta has moved to stay enforcement pending appeal. Texas never joined the multistate case either, and on August 26 announced its own settlement with Meta worth more than $1 billion on similar teen-safety terms. Florida, by contrast, was a plaintiff in the coordinated litigation with a live claim and simply declined the money.

A note on the headline number. This site uses the agreement's own maximum for the multistate deal, roughly $17 billion over ten years, of which about $12.2 billion is guaranteed and about $5 billion is contingent on Snap, TikTok, and YouTube adopting equivalent protections. Some outlets covering Florida's decision round the combined total to $18 billion. The difference is presentation, not a new payment.

What it means for families with a claim

Nothing, directly, and that is the point worth repeating. The attorneys general cases, settled or not, are government enforcement actions about consumer protection and children's privacy. The claims of families whose children developed depression, eating disorders, self-harm, or suicidal thoughts after heavy platform use are personal-injury cases, filed individually, coordinated in MDL-3047 federally and in JCCP 5255 in California. Meta's settlement with the states expressly preserved those claims. Florida's refusal to settle does not speed them up, slow them down, or change who qualifies, in Florida or anywhere else.

What Florida's decision does is keep one more addictive-design case alive against Meta with a state's resources behind it, alongside the consolidated California bellwether trial reported for October 28 and the federal school-district trial set for February 2027. Meta has now paid the states, agreed to a decade of court-ordered design changes, and still has trials ahead. That is the context the personal-injury cases proceed in.

This is general litigation reporting, not legal advice. Filing deadlines are set by state law and vary; for minors they are often paused until adulthood but do run. Anyone weighing a claim should speak with a licensed attorney about their own situation. Our step-by-step filing guide explains how an individual case is filed and what happens after a review.