Second Social Media Addiction Trial Opens in Los Angeles: Meta and Snap Face the Jury
Seven months after a Los Angeles jury returned the first verdict in the social media addiction litigation, a second trial was set to open in the same courthouse on October 28, 2026, with jury selection before Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl, Reuters reported. The case shrank on the way to trial. TikTok and YouTube settled with both young plaintiffs, and Meta settled with one of them, S.J., Reuters reported. What remains is both plaintiffs' claims against Snap and the Mississippi plaintiff K.D.B.'s claims against Meta. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify, tentatively on November 10.
This trial involves two plaintiffs. Everyone else's case continues. If a child or young adult in your family developed depression, an eating disorder, self-harm, or suicidal thoughts after heavy Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, or YouTube use as a minor, claims are still being filed. A free case check takes about two minutes.
Start your free case checkTrial log
- Day 1
Oct 28 Jury selection was set to begin, Reuters reported that morning. Going in, S.J. had settled with Meta, leaving Snap as the only defendant on her claims and Meta and Snap as defendants on K.D.B.'s. Meta and Snap's request to split the two cases into separate trials was still pending. Opening statements are expected November 4, AFP reported.
What we know
- The trial
- The second bellwether trial in California's coordinated proceeding (JCCP 5255), before Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. It was set to begin with jury selection on October 28, 2026 and is expected to run for several weeks, Reuters reported that morning.
- The plaintiffs
- S.J., 16, from Illinois, and K.D.B., 18, from Mississippi. They allege that autoplay, infinite scroll, and other design features drove them to compulsive use, and that they developed depression, anxiety, and eating disorders as a result (Reuters).
- Who is on trial
- Snap faces both plaintiffs. Meta faces K.D.B. only: S.J. settled her claims against Meta before trial, Reuters reported. Terms were not reported.
- Who settled out
- TikTok settled with both plaintiffs in August, and YouTube settled with both on September 25, the Daily Journal reported. Both remain defendants in the wider litigation.
- The executives
- Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram head Adam Mosseri, and Snap CEO Evan Spiegel are expected to testify. Under a tentative schedule reported by the Daily Journal, Zuckerberg is expected on November 10 and Mosseri on November 19.
- The first trial
- In K.G.M., the first California bellwether, a jury found Meta and Google negligent on March 25, 2026 and awarded $6 million. Judge Kuhl upheld the verdict on June 9, and Meta and Google are appealing.
What's still unknown
- One trial or two
- Meta and Snap asked Judge Kuhl to split the cases into separate trials, arguing that trying them together would mix up the evidence for jurors. As of October 28 she had not ruled, Reuters reported.
- Opening statements
- Opening statements are expected on November 4 if no further settlements are reached, AFP reported.
- What the jury may hear
- Before trial the parties fought over whether jurors may hear that lawyer advertising prompted the families to sue, over K.D.B.'s journals and S.J.'s apparent ChatGPT use, and over what Meta may say about its later safety changes and its settlement with the states. No ruling on the lawyer-advertising request has been reported.
- The outcome
- No verdict. A verdict for either side would inform settlement talks across the litigation but would not set a value for any other case.
Key Takeaways
- The second California social media addiction bellwether trial was set to open with jury selection on October 28, 2026 before Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl in Los Angeles (JCCP 5255)
- Meta settled with S.J. before trial, Reuters reported, so Snap faces both plaintiffs and Meta faces K.D.B. only; terms were not reported
- TikTok settled with both plaintiffs in August and YouTube settled with both on September 25, as reported by the Daily Journal
- Zuckerberg, Mosseri, and Spiegel are expected to testify; opening statements are expected November 4, AFP reported
- A verdict here informs settlement talks but sets no per-person value; the federal MDL held 3,824 pending cases in the October 2026 JPML report, and claims are still being filed
Who is on trial, and who settled out
Three plaintiffs were set for October; two reached trial. S.J., a 16-year-old from Illinois, and K.D.B., an 18-year-old from Mississippi, sued in 2023 and are bellwether plaintiffs in California's coordinated proceeding, test cases picked to show how juries respond to the claims in more than 3,000 lawsuits gathered in the Los Angeles court. The third, P.M.Y., resolved her claims against TikTok in August and dismissed the rest, with no payment from Meta reported. Judge Kuhl consolidated S.J. and K.D.B. into a single trial in late August over Meta's objection that two plaintiffs would confuse a jury.
The defendant list then shrank. TikTok settled with both plaintiffs in early August, as it did before the K.G.M. and R.K.C. trials. Google's YouTube settled with both on September 25, on undisclosed terms, according to the Daily Journal. And before trial, S.J. settled with Meta, Reuters reported, so the jury will hear both plaintiffs' claims against Snap and only K.D.B.'s claims against Meta. As far as has been reported, it is Meta's first settlement with a California personal-injury bellwether plaintiff: Meta went to verdict in K.G.M., R.K.C. dismissed his claims against Meta without a payment, and P.M.Y. dropped hers with no Meta payment reported. Snap, which settled with both earlier California bellwether plaintiffs before their trials, is a trial defendant for the first time, AFP reported.
What the jury is being asked to decide
As in K.G.M., the case is about how the apps were designed rather than any particular post. The plaintiffs say they began using YouTube as young as 3 or 4 and other platforms around 9, and that features like autoplay and infinite scroll drove compulsive use that led to depression, anxiety, and eating disorders, Reuters reported. Both described staying up for hours scrolling and losing focus in class. They seek unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Meta and Snap deny the claims. "A young person's mental health is shaped by many factors, as the evidence in this trial will show," a Meta spokesperson said, adding that the plaintiff used TikTok far more than Instagram or Facebook. A Snap spokesperson said Snapchat differs from traditional social media because it does not open to a feed, and that "these allegations fundamentally misrepresent their experiences on Snapchat and how our platform was designed." Meta and Snap have also asked Judge Kuhl to try the two cases separately, arguing that a joint trial would mix up the evidence for jurors; she had not ruled as of October 28.
Much of the pretrial fighting was about what the jury may hear: whether lawyer advertising prompted the families to sue, K.D.B.'s journals, S.J.'s apparent use of ChatGPT, and what Meta may tell jurors about its later safety changes and its settlement with the states if the case reaches a punitive damages phase. At the September 29 conference Judge Kuhl rejected a broader defense request to reopen the plaintiffs' depositions, the Daily Journal reported. No ruling on the lawyer-advertising request has been reported.
The witnesses to watch
Judge Kuhl rejected Meta's bid to keep Mark Zuckerberg and Adam Mosseri off the stand; both testified in K.G.M. Under a tentative schedule, Zuckerberg is expected on November 10 and Mosseri on November 19, and Snap CEO Evan Spiegel is also expected, the Daily Journal reported. The judge allowed the parties to arrange video testimony for the company executives. We will add each appearance to the trial log after it happens.
How it fits the larger litigation
This is a California state-court trial, separate from the federal MDL, but the two move together. The federal MDL-3047 held 3,824 pending cases in the October 2026 JPML report, and its first school-district bellwether trials (Tucson Unified and Charleston County, tried one after the other) begin with jury selection on February 3, 2027. In California, the next bellwether group (the Loach, Kelly, and I.P. cases) is set for March 16, 2027, and a further trial is reported for August 6, 2027. Meta's August settlement with the state attorneys general, up to roughly $17 billion paid to the states, expressly preserved personal-injury and school-district claims like these.
What it means for families with a claim
A bellwether is a test case, not a deadline. Whatever this jury decides, every other family's case continues on its own track, and new cases are filed every month. A plaintiff verdict would strengthen claimants' hand in settlement talks; a defense verdict would do the opposite. Neither would set what any other case is worth, and there is still no global settlement or per-person payout in this litigation.
This is general litigation reporting, not legal advice. Filing deadlines are set by state law, vary widely, and for minors are often paused until adulthood but do run. Anyone weighing a claim should speak with a licensed attorney about their own situation. Our step-by-step filing guide explains how the process works.
Full social media lawsuit background & eligibility
For the California trial tracker, the K.G.M. verdict, the settlements so far, and who may qualify, visit our JCCP 5255 page or the MDL-3047 hub.
Sources
- • Reuters, "Meta and Snap face major US legal test of youth social media addiction claims" (Oct. 28, 2026).
- • AFP, "Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media's harms" (Oct. 28, 2026), as published by The Economic Times.
- • Daily Journal, "YouTube settles as Meta executives may testify in addiction trial" (Sept. 29, 2026).
- • Law.com / The Recorder, "After Court Ruling, Zuckerberg Set to Testify Again About Social Media Addiction" (Sept. 29, 2026).
- • Daily Journal, reporting on the 2027 trial settings and the lawyer-advertising dispute (Sept. 10 and Sept. 17, 2026).
- • Joint case management statement, MDL-3047 Dkt. 3490 (October 28 trial, Trial Pool 3).
- • Bloomberg Law, consolidation order (Sept. 1, 2026) and P.M.Y. dismissal (Aug. 20, 2026).
- • Reuters, "TikTok settling three teen social media lawsuits ahead of trial" (Aug. 3, 2026).
- • Case Management Order No. 37, MDL-3047 Dkt. 3534 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2026).
- • U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Pending MDL Dockets report, October 2026 (3,824 pending actions in MDL-3047).
Attorney Advertising. The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this content.
Every case is unique, and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances involved. Past settlement amounts and case outcomes do not guarantee similar results in your case. If you believe you have a legal claim, you should consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who can evaluate your specific situation.